From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul  8 09:24:34 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F62B37B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue,  8 Jul 2003 09:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.chesapeake.net (chesapeake.net [208.142.252.6])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A55D43F93
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue,  8 Jul 2003 09:24:33 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net)
Received: from localhost (jroberson@localhost)
	by mail.chesapeake.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h68GOQk65311;
	Tue, 8 Jul 2003 12:24:26 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net)
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 12:24:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net>
To: Ian Freislich <ianf@za.uu.net>
In-Reply-To: <15186.1057667588@mci.com>
Message-ID: <20030708122410.W17881-100000@mail.chesapeake.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ULE SMP fixed. 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 16:24:34 -0000

On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Ian Freislich wrote:

> Ian Freislich wrote:
> > Jeff Roberson wrote:
> > > Squashed the bug that was causing panics with nice processes on SMP ULE.
> >
> > That is really good news.  I will give it a try later today and let
> > you know if I still get panics with ULE enabled.
>
> Well, the uptime says it all: no panics yet which is very nice.  Thank-you.
>
> It seems that there is still a problem with the CPU accounting
> (which is certainly not a problem far less severe than panics)
>

Yep, I'll get to that next.

> last pid:   906;  load averages:  2.61,  2.50,  2.41    up 0+01:21:16  14:29:36
> 38 processes:  4 running, 34 sleeping
> CPU states:  0.0% user, 99.8% nice,  0.0% system,  0.2% interrupt,  0.0% idle
> Mem: 21M Active, 15M Inact, 22M Wired, 4K Cache, 28M Buf, 127M Free
> Swap: 512M Total, 512M Free
>
>   PID USERNAME  PRI NICE   SIZE    RES STATE  C   TIME   WCPU    CPU COMMAND
>   580 ianf      139   20  1072K   880K RUN    0  78:46 105.47% 105.47% dnetc
>   574 ianf      139   20  1072K   880K CPU1   1  79:21 100.78% 100.78% dnetc
>   451 root      114    0  3468K  2564K select 1   0:02 13.28% 13.28% sshd
>   372 root        4    0  1296K   976K accept 1   0:00  6.25%  6.25% nfsd
>   906 root       76    0  2220K  1476K CPU0   0   0:00  2.34%  2.34% top
>   899 ianf        8    0  1632K  1340K wait   0   0:00  0.78%  0.78% su
>
> Ian
>