From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 18 05:23:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEE216A4CE; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 05:23:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from gw.celabo.org (gw.celabo.org [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8E043D1D; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 05:23:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "madman.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (verified OK)) by gw.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D9654883; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:23:03 -0600 (CST) Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D9CE16D455; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:23:02 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:23:02 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Oliver Eikemeier Message-ID: <20040218132302.GC41855@madman.celabo.org> References: <20040218093622.GA1676@laptop.6bone.nl> <403347A8.2070907@fillmore-labs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <403347A8.2070907@fillmore-labs.com> X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i-ja.1 cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: CHOI Junho cc: Mark Santcroos cc: JunSeon Oh cc: Hye-Shik Chang Subject: Re: % in filenames X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:23:03 -0000 On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 12:08:24PM +0100, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Mark Santcroos wrote: > > >Hi all, > > > >Is it really necessary to have the "%" in filenames? > >(list below) > > > >It breaks for me having the ports tree in perforce. > > > >Thanks > > > >Mark > > > >./archivers/dpkg/files/patch-utils%start-stop-daemon.c,v > >./korean/ami/files/patch-src%ami.c,v > >./korean/bitchx/files/patch-source%modules.c,v > >./lang/egcs/files/patch-cp%decl.c,v > >./lang/egcs/files/patch-cp%ptree.c,v > >./lang/egcs/files/patch-libiberty%Makefile.in,v > >./mail/exim-old/files/patch-src%smtp_in.c,v > >./mail/postfix1/files/patch-src%trivial-rewrite%resolve.c,v > >./sysutils/e2fsprogs/files/patch-intl%Makefile.in,v > >./japanese/im-ja/files/Attic/patch-data%Makefile.in,v > >./japanese/im-ja/files/Attic/patch-src%hiragana-convertable.h,v > >./japanese/im-ja/files/Attic/patch-src%hiragana-convertable.txt,v > >./japanese/im-ja/files/Attic/patch-src%wnnlib.c,v > >./japanese/im-ja/files/patch-src%Makefile.in,v > > Nope. Fixed in lang/egcs mail/exim-old mail/postfix1 sysutils/e2fsprogs, > thanks for the heads-up. > > Oliver I usually use `::' as the path separator, not `%'. I can't remember why I used `%' for im-ja. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@freebsd.org