From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 26 20:41:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E9737B401 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 20:41:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (Haldjas.folklore.ee [193.40.6.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2912943FCB for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 20:41:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee) Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.12.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h3R3fD6U043078; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 06:41:14 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee) Received: from localhost (narvi@localhost)h3R3f96N043075; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 06:41:13 +0300 (EEST) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 06:41:09 +0300 (EEST) From: Narvi To: Peter Wemm In-Reply-To: <20030424181501.1B3972A7EA@canning.wemm.org> Message-ID: <20030427064014.H40030-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: x86-64 support X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 03:41:17 -0000 On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Peter Wemm wrote: > Wilko Bulte wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 09:42:38AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > > > Wilko Bulte wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 08:50:07AM -0700, Andrew Kinney wrote: > > > > > On 24 Apr 2003, at 9:56, Anthony Schneider wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > this doesn't look very pOwErFuL. :( > > > > > > > > > > > > > CPU: AMD ClawHammer(tm) (3.14-MHz Hammer-class CPU) > > > > > > > > > > > > -Anthony. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's the low budget "crawlhammer" version. Someone's reading > > > > > the CPUID wrong! ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, somebody not allowed by an NDA to display the actual cpu clock > > > > frequency. > > > > > > And I would have thought it would have been obvious.. :-/ > > > > I would have thought so too... :-/ > > > > Maybe have it display: 3.1415926535897 MHz? > > Don't get me started... :-) I still have the first ~50 or so digits > memorized. Or even worse, I could put a pi calculator in the kernel. :-) > option DISPLAY_PI_MHZ option USE_PI_DIGITS 100 /me runs fast > Cheers, > -Peter > -- > Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com > "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >