From owner-cvs-all Thu Jan 3 11:20:13 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695CD37B417; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:20:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020103192009.HYTH20119.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 19:20:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA24308; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:19:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:19:28 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Stephen McKay , John Baldwin , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, Julian Elischer , Greg Lehey Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man3 queue.3 In-Reply-To: <951.1010057694@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > If for instance we (re)introduce CIRCLEQ or certain other queue > types, it is by no means obvious that the continuation clause > of the FOREACH() will be "!= NULL". But that would not be TAILQ_FOREACH, which is the only one I'm talking about. So it's irrelevant, and WHY it's behaviour should be documented. so that you can tell the difference between the behaviour of a TAILQ_FOREACH and CIRCLEQ_FOREACH. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message