Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Jun 1999 08:39:32 -0600
From:      Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, "Russell L. Carter" <rcarter@pinyon.org>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...)
Message-ID:  <37724324.E984AFD@softweyr.com>
References:  <Pine.BSF.3.95.990623213838.993R-100000@current1.whistle.com> <3771CBA7.4973C681@softweyr.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wes Peters wrote:
> 
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> > ok here are some of the problems..
> >
> > Matt's changes allow dd to copy data at 2.5 times the rate it did before.
> > I consider dd to be an application. The problem is due to resource
> > handling in the kernel and results in large amounts of Idle CPU time.
> >
> > Another primary problem with the FreeBSD kernel (being addressed by Kirk)
> > is that after writing a file, once the data has been queued for IO you
> > cannot read the data in that file (even though it is present) until the IO
> > is complete. With 64 tags, it is concievable that this could take a half
> > second on a modern disk.
> >
> > These are problems shown up by the benchmarks but
> > which can be shown to affect ordinary operations.
> >
> > There are other problems related to SMP and the GKL..
> > e.g.. two processes cannot access buffers at the same time, even though
> > they are both present , because only one of them is allowed in the kernel
> > at a time. Therefore One processor will spend a bunch of time at idle..
> 
> I think it's been pretty well known since the beginning that FreeBSD
> SMP performance is nothing to cheer about.  How does FreeBSD fare
> against NT or other systems on single processor systems?

Sorry to follow up on my own message, but I noted today in PCWeek
their trip back to the benchmark lab includes ripping 3 CPUs and
768M RAM out of the system, to benchmark how Linux and NT perform
on "lower-end" hardware.  They also allowed the RedHat dudes to
switch to an Adaptec SCSI controller to talk to the RAID array.  
How are we holding up under this "diminished" configuration?

-- 
       "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"

Wes Peters                                                 Softweyr LLC
http://www.softweyr.com/~softweyr                      wes@softweyr.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37724324.E984AFD>