Date: Sun, 27 Apr 1997 19:37:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Kory Hamzeh <kory@avatar.com> To: Ben Black <black@zen.cypher.net> Cc: Chris Browning <brownie@earthling.net>, Mr M P Searle <csubl@csv.warwick.ac.uk>, smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quad Pro 150 motherboard? Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.91.970427193614.6486C-100000@avatar.avatar.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970427223039.32065J-100000@zen.cypher.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm not going to sit here and argue with you. I am just saying that I have uses for more than two CPU's, and it is not a server. On Sun, 27 Apr 1997, Ben Black wrote: > and enough people do this to drive demand up so much that the price drops > below $3k for a quad P6 board? > > On Sun, 27 Apr 1997, Kory Hamzeh wrote: > > > > > Actually, I use pmake and something touching one .h file causes massive > > compiles, and, I build for many platforms. > > > > > > On Sun, 27 Apr 1997, Ben Black wrote: > > > > > well, is one person capable of changing so many source files between > > > compiles that they need 4 CPUs to get it done in reasonable time? or is > > > it that a *group* of developers all using the system as a compile > > > *server* could do that? > > > > > > > > > b3n > > > > > > On Sun, 27 Apr 1997, Kory Hamzeh wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > What about using the system for software developement (lots of compiles, > > > > emacs, etc...)? Does having more than 2 cpu make sense? > > > > > > > > Kory > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 27 Apr 1997, Chris Browning wrote: > > > > > > > > > Michael, > > > > > I concur with Ben here. Typically in the PC world, anything above > > > > > 2 procs is geared towards servers. I can't think of many non-server > > > > > > 2way systems out there. So, if you want >2way, you will have > > > > > to go with one of the server class machines, which are typically > > > > > expensive. In addition, I would not bother with the 150MHz PPP. If > > > > > I remember correctly, the 150 only comes in the 256k cache size. If > > > > > you are going to do 4way, do yourself a favor and get the 512k cache > > > > > PPP. 4way PPP will saturate the processor bus quite quickly, so the > > > > > more cache the better. I believe they make a 166/512k PPP, so for > > > > > cost effectiveness, that is what I would recommend. > > > > > > > > > > Chris > > > > > Not speaking for Intel. > > > > > Ben Black wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > a 4 or 6 CPU P6 board for *other* than a large server...think about that > > > > > > for a few minutes. > > > > > > > > > > > > (hint: NT4 Workstation can't handle more than 2CPUs and that is the most > > > > > > popular commercial SMP-capable OS) > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 28 Apr 1997, Mr M P Searle wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there such a thing as a cheap quad Pentium Pro motherboard? I'm looking > > > > > > > for an SMP Pro 150, but there aren't many 4 or 6 Pro motherboards > > > > > > > around, and those that I could find were for large servers (eg Intel Alder, > > > > > > > Goliath, etc.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Michael. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- > > > > > Version: 2.6.2 > > > > > > > > > > mQCNAzJSHeUAAAEEAKQrvftlb+sbnw0hA5vW2Orzq3rCGypldkYxRdXhx0yWx/dY > > > > > U2PMqxgTwlOeQl3wA1IIWGMaHhbpPp0IegkOm9HIHEvc2G8uWywN5OvkaVFyuIHL > > > > > juZ6VSem3cd63bqpNe3ZWtWwQdjFivm+YNeQveV220eTPfTuvbz7xZq+b9WZAAUR > > > > > tCtDaHJpcyBTaGVybWFuIEJyb3duaW5nIDxjYnJvd25AYXJhY25ldC5jb20+ > > > > > =NxsF > > > > > -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.91.970427193614.6486C-100000>