Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 19:16:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws> To: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ntpd vs ntpdate with no hardware clock Message-ID: <454282477.15929.1720372600841@localhost> In-Reply-To: <Zoq7xD2BRT6YyF6l@www.zefox.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
------=_Part_15928_2098316081.1720372600838 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I created fakertc for my rpi4. https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fakertc/ Saves the time on shutdown and sets it back early at boot. Plus I use ntpdate together with ntpd. Works fine. Regards, Ronald Van: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> Datum: 7 juli 2024 18:01 Aan: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Onderwerp: ntpd vs ntpdate with no hardware clock > > > Just tried using ntpd with a fresh 14.1 installation on a Pi4. > Near as I can tell, ntpd reports a failure due to the clock > being off by too much, even if it's set manually to within > a minute before reboot. Probably that's caused by the lack > of a hardware clock on the Pi4, linux has a bodge called > fake-hwclock. Is there an equivalent workaround for FreeBSD? > > In the meantime ntpdate seems to work, though deprecated > > Thanks for reading, > > bob prohaska > > > > > > ------=_Part_15928_2098316081.1720372600838 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <html><head></head><body>I created fakertc for my rpi4. <div><br></div><div><a href="https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fakertc/">https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fakertc/</a></div><div><br></div><div>Saves the time on shutdown and sets it back early at boot.</div><div><br></div><div>Plus I use ntpdate together with ntpd. Works fine.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Ronald</div><div><br><p><small><strong>Van:</strong> bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net><br><strong>Datum:</strong> 7 juli 2024 18:01<br><strong>Aan:</strong> freebsd-arm@freebsd.org<br><strong>Onderwerp:</strong> ntpd vs ntpdate with no hardware clock<br></small></p><blockquote style="margin-left: 5px; border-left: 3px solid #ccc; margin-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px;"><div class="MessageRFC822Viewer do_not_remove" id="P"><!-- P --> <!-- processMimeMessage --><div class="TextPlainViewer do_not_remove" id="P.P"><!-- P.P -->Just tried using ntpd with a fresh 14.1 installation on a Pi4.<br> Near as I can tell, ntpd reports a failure due to the clock<br> being off by too much, even if it's set manually to within<br> a minute before reboot. Probably that's caused by the lack<br> of a hardware clock on the Pi4, linux has a bodge called<br> fake-hwclock. Is there an equivalent workaround for FreeBSD?<br> <br> In the meantime ntpdate seems to work, though deprecated<br> <br> Thanks for reading,<br> <br> bob prohaska<br> <br> <br> </div><!-- TextPlainViewer --> <hr> </div><!-- MessageRFC822Viewer --> </blockquote><br><br><br></div></body></html> ------=_Part_15928_2098316081.1720372600838--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?454282477.15929.1720372600841>