From owner-freebsd-arch  Fri Jun 21 18:40:14 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from sccrmhc02.attbi.com (sccrmhc02.attbi.com [204.127.202.62])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C5537B40E
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 18:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8])
          by sccrmhc02.attbi.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP
          id <20020622014009.ZLMT1547.sccrmhc02.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>;
          Sat, 22 Jun 2002 01:40:09 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1])
	by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA39109;
	Fri, 21 Jun 2002 18:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 18:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>,
	Gary Thorpe <gat7634@hotmail.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: multiple threads for interrupts
In-Reply-To: <20020622011122.GF37053@elvis.mu.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0206211834120.38383-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-arch.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-arch>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-arch>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I don't know yet if the problem occurs with no threaded apps
I don't think so...

I'd like to commit in a couple of days but I'd also like to get this sort
of problem out first..


On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:

> * Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> [020621 17:40] wrote:
> > I have a tricky linked list (read thread run queue) corruption problem
> > I''ve been chasing for a couple of days..
> > 
> > it only shows up under moderate load.. e.g. 20 threaded processes, each
> > with
> > 3 kernel threads.
> > I'm closing in though..
> 
> Does it cause problems when no threads are active (just processes)?
> Basically I'd love to see this committed already if the base stability
> issues are mostly cleaned up.  If threads cause issues then that's
> ok isn't it?
> 
> -Alfred
> 
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message