From owner-freebsd-security  Sat Apr 22 11:55:57 1995
Return-Path: security-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA29730
          for security-outgoing; Sat, 22 Apr 1995 11:55:57 -0700
Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (precipice.shockwave.com [171.69.108.33])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA29724
          for <security@freebsd.org>; Sat, 22 Apr 1995 11:55:56 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA10750 for <security@freebsd.org>; Sat, 22 Apr 1995 11:55:24 -0700
Message-Id: <199504221855.LAA10750@precipice.shockwave.com>
To: security@FreeBSD.org
Subject: US regulations on 'hooks' for encryption
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 1995 11:55:23 -0700
From: Paul Traina <pst@Shockwave.COM>
Sender: security-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In the old days, I seem to recall that we had regulations prohibiting
the export of code that had 'hooks' showing where encryption would be
used,  if it was available.

I thought this changed back in '92,  and now we can export everything except
the encryption technology itself.

Does anyone KNOW FOR A FACT if this is true?  It would be nice to get rid
of user programs in the secure distribution and merge that stuff back into
the mainline code.

Paul