From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 21 10:55:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD6E37C038; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 10:55:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id KAA32940; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 10:55:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 10:55:29 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway To: Brad Knowles Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , David Murphy , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Voxware is toast. Get used to it. (Re: Suggestions for improving newpcm performance?) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Brad Knowles wrote: > I can't speak for the relative quality of 4.0 versus 3.0, but > I'll take your word for it. However, if you're going to compare 4.0 > to 3.4, then I think a perfect counter-example is the message that > got this whole thread started -- voxware. Voxware is still supported in 4.0 and won't be removed. This thread started with speculation about what might happen during the course of development of 5.0-CURRENT over the next year or more. Kris ---- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message