From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Nov 14 09:38:45 1996 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA20435 for stable-outgoing; Thu, 14 Nov 1996 09:38:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from Rigel.orionsys.com (root@rigel.orionsys.com [205.148.224.9]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA20427 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 1996 09:38:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (dbabler@localhost) by Rigel.orionsys.com (8.7.6/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA25477; Thu, 14 Nov 1996 09:38:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 09:38:22 -0800 (PST) From: Dave Babler To: Richard Wackerbarth cc: stable@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: CTM coredumps on src-2.1.0196.gz... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 13 Nov 1996, Richard Wackerbarth wrote: > >Is there a resolution for this? I just checked and the .0196 issue is > >still the same version I and others had problems running. Many complaints > >during the process about non-existing files and ultimate checksum failure. > > As someone else already reported, and I verified, starting with base > update file from 2.1.5 CD, everything updates just fine. I suggest that you > clean your tree and rebuild it. > I deleted the whole tree, relinked the CD source tree and started CTM from 0147 again... and it stopped on 0196 again, still complaining about hundreds of non-existant files and MD5 mismatches before aborting, the same as the first time around. I've compared the 0196 file I received by mail and it matches the one on freefall. I'm rather mystified as to why starting from scratch would have produced a different result anyway, since they're exactly the same patches. The 0196 patch fails at: FN: gnu/usr.bin/patch/EXTRN.h md5 mismatch FN: gnu/usr.bin/patch/EXTRN.h edit fails Exit(120) The file in question is still linked to the CD-ROM file, so it's never been modified before this patch. At this point, I'm wondering if I might just be better off switching over to -current at his point anyway. -Dave