From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 18 23:30:20 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BFF16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:30:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.192])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32CDF43D31
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:30:20 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com)
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c16so45286rne
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:30:19 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
	s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
	b=XFvoCMRGoVffOzLIIBAUHLSthgfzQZz0cD8adAWXzqEvVy1a3l1qJxmolCn7O2FTh7r9eFnNa4YX0hVgGzrD3QpqC/9azrZRI3NgKaJQmUbKM5J6PglUUDHkJompp4pX7+moXZT3J8wrHNSAAMK47TwQnnZJUdDomN0Fqj3+zhg=
Received: by 10.38.72.28 with SMTP id u28mr1443rna;
        Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:30:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.39.1.45 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:30:19 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <3aaaa3a0501181530975fecf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:30:19 +0000
From: Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com>
To: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de>
In-Reply-To: <41ECBED0.8000704@incubus.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050112173437.089758a0@64.7.153.2>
	 <20050113225145.GA781@galgenberg.net>
	 <6.2.0.14.0.20050113193132.042966c8@64.7.153.2>
	 <20050117193844.GB1110@galgenberg.net>
	 <20050117224809.GC31463@xor.obsecurity.org>
	 <6.2.0.14.0.20050117210539.08489c28@64.7.153.2>
	 <41ECBED0.8000704@incubus.de>
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe problems in RELENG_5 ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com>
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:30:20 -0000

I have been compiling ports using -O2 since I started using FreeBSD
back in 2003 and only port that has had issues with this is lang/ezm3
in FreeBSD 5.2.1 it needed -O.

Chris


On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:46:24 +0100, Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de> wrote:
> Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > At 05:48 PM 17/01/2005, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> > Like I said before, switching back to -O makes the system stable once
> > again.  I let it run continuous buildworlds without issue for 24hrs
> > along with burnP6, and memtest running in the background.  No problem.
> 
> Then I'd leave it at that.  The difference between gcc -O2 and -O is
> marginal at best.  Think of it as -O being the large axe that chops off
> a huge slab, and -O2 being the large axe, followed by some scratching
> with a nail-file.  Most of the time it isn't worth the effort.
> 
> mkb.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>