Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 9 Jul 2009 15:05:30 +0200
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Marius_N=FCnnerich?= <marius@nuenneri.ch>
To:        Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: glabel and real disk IDs
Message-ID:  <b649e5e0907090605g7979da3cl6d530c0b0d8b46ec@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <h34lml$6fv$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:  <h34lml$6fv$1@ger.gmane.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 13:52, Ivan Voras<ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been working with glabels for a time and just remembered that ATA (ad)
> drives do in fact export the drive ID, for example:
>
> # diskinfo -v ad4
> ad4
>        512             # sectorsize
>        320072933376    # mediasize in bytes (298G)
>        625142448       # mediasize in sectors
>        620181          # Cylinders according to firmware.
>        16              # Heads according to firmware.
>        63              # Sectors according to firmware.
>        ad:9QF4H15Y     # Disk ident.
>
> # diskinfo -v ad6
> ad6
>        512             # sectorsize
>        320072933376    # mediasize in bytes (298G)
>        625142448       # mediasize in sectors
>        620181          # Cylinders according to firmware.
>        16              # Heads according to firmware.
>        63              # Sectors according to firmware.
>        ad:9QF4EP7A     # Disk ident.
>
> # diskinfo -v ad8
> ad8
>        512             # sectorsize
>        320072933376    # mediasize in bytes (298G)
>        625142448       # mediasize in sectors
>        620181          # Cylinders according to firmware.
>        16              # Heads according to firmware.
>        63              # Sectors according to firmware.
>        ad:9QF4H16L     # Disk ident.
>
> I don't think it would be hard to add a label parser to gather this
> information and export it as a label.
>
> The purpose of this would be to have a unique disk ID without explicitly
> setting a label (e.g. as is commonly advised for ZFS and drive swapping).
>
> Any objections?

I like the idea. If one should use it in which situation is something different.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b649e5e0907090605g7979da3cl6d530c0b0d8b46ec>