From owner-freebsd-current Sat Nov 18 9:51:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (flutter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.147]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B075837B479 for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 09:51:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eAIKa2733307; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 21:36:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Julian Elischer Cc: David Malone , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Typo in labpc.c In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 18 Nov 2000 09:45:05 PST." <3A16C021.FAF9B3A9@elischer.org> Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 21:36:02 +0100 Message-ID: <33305.974579762@critter> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >> >This seems to only do the cdevsw_add if the malloc failed. I presume >> >this is the opposit of the intended sense. I'll fix it up if you also >> >think it looks wrong. >> >> If nobody have noticed in "17 months, 2 weeks ago" (as cvs-web says) >> that labpc doesn't work, the labpc driver should be killed, not fixed. >> >> Objections ? > >What you are saying is that people who may be using this driver have >not yet moved up to -current or 4.x and as such should not be allowed >to? I'm saying: "If nobody have noticed in "17 months, 2 weeks ago" (as cvs-web says) that labpc doesn't work, the labpc driver should be killed, not fixed." That's 1.5 year Julian, and if nobody *who is using it* objects it goes. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message