From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 15 17:38:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A8BF16A402; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 17:38:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10BD843D45; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 17:38:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3FHaFMF032220; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 11:36:15 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 11:36:30 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20060415.113630.81407700.imp@bsdimp.com> To: deischen@freebsd.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: References: <20060414182846.GA702@pato.euesrg02.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: victor@bsdes.net, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Missing dependencies on shared libraries X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 17:38:09 -0000 In message: Daniel Eischen writes: : On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: : : > Hi, : > I found that ldd doesn't report libc as a dependency on most (all?) : > libraries: : > : > pato> ldd /usr/lib/libfetch.so : > /usr/lib/libfetch.so: : > libssl.so.3 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 (0x4816a000) : > libcrypto.so.3 => /lib/libcrypto.so.3 (0x48198000) : > : > does anyone know why? : : AFAIK, it's being worked on. It's not just libc either, -pthread : also has to start linking to libpthread. We don't record libc dependencies into shared libraries right now. If we did, that would create some problems and solve some problems. With symbol versioning, it most likely will become moot, since we'll never have to bump libc major version again... Warner