From owner-cvs-usrsbin Wed Aug 16 23:26:11 1995 Return-Path: cvs-usrsbin-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id XAA22610 for cvs-usrsbin-outgoing; Wed, 16 Aug 1995 23:26:11 -0700 Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (precipice.shockwave.com [171.69.108.33]) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA22595 ; Wed, 16 Aug 1995 23:26:00 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id XAA04528; Wed, 16 Aug 1995 23:24:52 -0700 Message-Id: <199508170624.XAA04528@precipice.shockwave.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Peter Wemm , CVS-commiters@freefall.FreeBSD.org, cvs-usrsbin@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/sendmail/src daemon.c deliver.c readcf.c In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 16 Aug 1995 23:16:06 PDT." <18710.808640166@time.cdrom.com> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 1995 23:24:51 -0700 From: Paul Traina Sender: cvs-usrsbin-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk How about rdist 6.x as a port? Given that -it- is the one going through development, it offers new features, and it is supported elsewhere, that seems like the best compromise. The new rdist doesn't have to ship as part of FreeBSD (at this time), and it would be a good canidate for moving to the external heirarchy once it (and we) mature. paul From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/sendmail/src daemon.c deliver.c readcf. >>c > Be REALLY careful what you do here. If you all of a sudden make us > incompatible with every non-FreeBSD machine out there, I will visit you > with a chain-saw. Aww Paul, you're such a party pooper! > It is possible to have "both" rdists, but you need to think about how you'r >>e > going to do that. Maybe one as a port? That would actually be easier! Jordan