From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 6 02:44:56 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA12432 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 6 Oct 1998 02:44:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA12410 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 1998 02:44:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA17953; Tue, 6 Oct 1998 02:40:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Luigi Rizzo cc: jonny@jonny.eng.br, Jeff@Wagsky.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfw SkipTo behavior changed In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 06 Oct 1998 08:37:05 BST." <199810060737.IAA05884@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1998 02:40:53 -0700 Message-ID: <17950.907666853@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I recall at least 3 different people going "huh?" in -stable, but I wouldn't swear on that exact number. :) - Jordan > > > The reason i did not fixed (yet) the code myself is that i think > > > it is not that safe to rely on this feature in a security module > > > such as ipfw. But if people want me to revert the code to the > > > default behaviour i have no problems with that. > > > > Considering the questions which have swirled around this, I think > > restoring the default behavior would be a good idea. > > ok fine (but i only see one such msg plus a couple of replies, did > i miss some ?) > > luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message