From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 21 21:00:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86163106566B for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:00:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710B68FC0A for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0LL0RRK062909 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:00:27 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q0LL0RVO062908; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:00:27 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:00:27 GMT Message-Id: <201201212100.q0LL0RVO062908@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tilman_Keskin=F6z?= Cc: Subject: Re: kern/163208: [pf] PF state key linking mismatch X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tilman_Keskin=F6z?= List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:00:27 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/163208; it has been noted by GNATS. From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tilman_Keskin=F6z?= To: Fabian Keil Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/163208: [pf] PF state key linking mismatch Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:52:09 +0100 On Jan 21, 2012, at 21:01 , Fabian Keil wrote: > Tilman Keskin=F6z wrote: >=20 >> Same here. >>=20 >> Also Fabian Keil reported this in >> = http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-July/025696.html >=20 > This has been fixed in CURRENT shortly thereafter: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2011-July/006199.html >=20 > Maybe the fix hasn't been MFC'd. Hm, r223765 happend before the RELENG_9 Branchpoint. So maybe the Fix was not complete?=