Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 22:59:49 +0200 From: Robert Millan <rmh@freebsd.org> To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, Steven Chamberlain <steven@pyro.eu.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Abort powerd when no cpufreq(4) support is found Message-ID: <CAOfDtXMZMy4RfpPEUKFJHnVrMYdtW-4DsdL_h7hD6SCA-By4JA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <30133A83-88E4-4715-8514-E9229E9AF078@root.org> References: <CAOfDtXO=7ALiBVHdY-hHa158yXoM%2BXXigkU4SObPHRr0h-2iUQ@mail.gmail.com> <E2E769FA-970A-4E1C-805B-DE6397B456C9@root.org> <CAOfDtXPW8ipGE5p=76HQ5pe9wGx0u%2BKYddRYN26pMW6O7wtENA@mail.gmail.com> <30133A83-88E4-4715-8514-E9229E9AF078@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El 9 d=E2=80=99abril de 2012 18:53, Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> ha escrit: > Fine by me. The rc framework or user should be the one to interpret the e= rror code and realize that it's ok that it's not running (not supported). Committed then, thanks for reviewing. --=20 Robert Millan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOfDtXMZMy4RfpPEUKFJHnVrMYdtW-4DsdL_h7hD6SCA-By4JA>