From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Nov 29 10:05:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA18886 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sun, 29 Nov 1998 10:05:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from calumet.infoteam.com (calumet.infoteam.com [207.2.129.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA18880 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 1998 10:05:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kmartin@calumet.infoteam.com) Received: (from kmartin@localhost) by calumet.infoteam.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA01741; Sun, 29 Nov 1998 13:05:19 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199811291805.NAA01741@calumet.infoteam.com> From: "Kenn Martin" To: "Mike Smith" Cc: "FreeBSD Stable List" Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 13:06:26 -0500 Reply-To: "Kenn Martin" X-Mailer: PMMail 98 Professional (2.01.1600) For Windows 98 (4.10.1998) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: NFS_SMALLFH Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 26 Nov 1998 07:42:56 -0800, Mike Smith wrote: >Please do; the issue is that if an NFS file handle larger than >NFS_SMALLFH is returned there is alternative code which needs to manage >the handle. If you can try reducing NFS_SMALLFH to 56 in >sys/nfs/nfsproto.h and do some NFS testing against a server in v3 mode, >that would be appreciated. I was going to suggest something smaller, but noticed a change to 52 to has already been checked in. What determines that structures greater than 256 bytes constitutes bloat? Is this specific to NFS? kenn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message