From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jul 13 12:12:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from funkthat.com (adsl-63-195-54-213.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.195.54.213]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F16A37BDED for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:12:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gurney_j@efn.org) Received: (from jmg@localhost) by funkthat.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) id MAA96302; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:12:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20000713121208.50527@hydrogen.funkthat.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:12:08 -0700 From: John-Mark Gurney To: Boris Popov Cc: Andrzej Bialecki , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SysctlFS References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.69 In-Reply-To: ; from Boris Popov on Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 08:17:30AM +0700 Reply-To: John-Mark Gurney Organization: Cu Networking X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE i386 X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 EC EF F8 AE ED A7 31 96 7A 22 B3 D8 56 36 F4 X-Files: The truth is out there X-URL: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/ Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Boris Popov scribbled this message on Jul 13: > On a side note: many things in the kernel can be represented (and > they are) as 'tree' structure. Nodes of that tree can have 'file' like [...] > /bus - newbus tree I think it's wrong to assume that this is a tree... I would like to see it move to a graph based structure... as we start off loading parts of processing, we will no longer have such an obvious nexus.. Each cpu should be the "root" of it's own tree... but that's just my view on the world.. :) -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 408 975 9651 Cu Networking "Thank God I'm an atheist, that'd just be confusing." -- cmc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message