From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 13 00:33:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5203516A4CE; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 00:33:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B9943D53; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 00:33:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j3D0XAml029261; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 17:33:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.NUXI.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j3D0XACf029260; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 17:33:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 17:33:10 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: SXren Schmidt , src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20050413003310.GA28592@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <200504121524.j3CFO0CT040913@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050412221659.GB19657@VARK.MIT.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050412221659.GB19657@VARK.MIT.EDU> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ata ata-raid.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 00:33:14 -0000 On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 06:16:59PM -0400, David Schultz wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2005, SXren Schmidt wrote: > > sos 2005-04-12 15:24:00 UTC > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: > > sys/dev/ata ata-raid.c > > Log: > > On amd64 int64_t != long long. > > It isn't? How many bits are in a 'long long' then? 64-bits. But it would be printed with %lld vs. %ld for int64_t which is a long. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)