From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Jun 18 10:14: 6 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.9])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C3714CA4
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 18 Jun 1999 10:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au)
Received: (from bde@localhost)
	by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id DAA02467;
	Sat, 19 Jun 1999 03:14:00 +1000
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 03:14:00 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199906181714.DAA02467@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: current@FreeBSD.ORG, jlemon@americantv.com
Subject: Re: New-bus driver question
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>  I'm also trying to write a driver under new-bus.  At what point is
>it safe to use interrupts to interrogate the card?  Anytime after I
>call bus_setup_intr(), (for a PCI card), or do I need to delay
>interrupt-driven configuration with config_intrhook_establish()?

The latter.  Working of interrupts after bus_setup_intr() is
machine-dependent, so drivers shouldn't assume that they work then.

Bruce


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message