From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 9 21:42:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843BD16A46C for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2008 21:42:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asmrookie@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A178E13C4EA for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2008 21:42:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asmrookie@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so3480801fgg.35 for ; Sat, 09 Feb 2008 13:42:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=dIo9OfBGPa0bD7CaoSePC9lM2FPZ72znfQnuYdGcY0s=; b=trJyEftHZ8a0yJtOIh0mOpmGassVNZb6uLLrN0MUEULc11McScBa5Qr1h1RLPmzcpAS/mrt80FLKHAprIIk6VHDrI+0qdMHlJwNaLIPiwp16AQPQncVbgcjK+KU7BF6b2mjsDvJ7pB8HHpVM4+DvUMcmrybE5u8VT6gVsN9JIm4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=pLEJcl4DbU7LMex4WS5msHYbN/B78xlz1aOBOVfRtvazPt7DLZx61FAIYJFdfVw290qxFehxiZ/2jwbm7LE3BGltiHg+mJbRAmndAcUi2iKc43ok4/VR/vj+ICyyyZ9Qrbb4Ujpz4FfR0UvHTJiqdOdSzYqtwlVw6FeUEBeHF9M= Received: by 10.86.4.2 with SMTP id 2mr2202809fgd.7.1202593347129; Sat, 09 Feb 2008 13:42:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.86.28.19 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Feb 2008 13:42:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3bbf2fe10802091342u189097cna04cbad8d0177efe@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 22:42:27 +0100 From: "Attilio Rao" Sender: asmrookie@gmail.com To: "Scot Hetzel" In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0802091338h4d2698d7v74fb029694bcf9bf@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <3bbf2fe10802061700p253e68b8s704deb3e5e4ad086@mail.gmail.com> <20080208162231.R17387@fledge.watson.org> <47ACD532.2090206@FreeBSD.org> <790a9fff0802091338h4d2698d7v74fb029694bcf9bf@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 49245fc8f2919dd9 Cc: Yar Tikhiy , Doug Barton , Jeff Roberson , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Robert Watson , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Eygene Ryabinkin Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove NTFS kernel support X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 21:42:29 -0000 2008/2/9, Scot Hetzel : > On 2/8/08, Doug Barton wrote: > > Robert Watson wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > > > > > >>> - Are you interested in maintaining it? > > >> > > >> Yes. If you can throw the buglist for NTFS on me, I will be very > > >> grateful. > > > > > > Sign the man up :-). > > > > > > Sounds good to me. I've posted on -current several times since > > December with crash dumps, etc. I think the problem at this point is > > that we don't know what the bugs are, or else I suspect at least some > > of them would be fixed already. > > > > I believe I have solved the panics with the NTFS filesystem by porting > the NetBSD lockmgr -> mutex locking changes to our NTFS filesystem > implementation. > > The locking changes are available in PR 120483 > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=120483 > > I have also submitted a style change PR which will allow us to easily > compare the NetBSD implementation to our NTFS implementation in PR > 120482: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=120482 Scot, why didn't you modify the patch in a way it reduces diffs against our HEAD as I suggested privately? :( Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein