From owner-freebsd-scsi Tue Dec 31 02:28:46 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id CAA23431 for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Tue, 31 Dec 1996 02:28:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from hda.hda.com (ip67-max1-fitch.ziplink.net [199.232.245.67]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id CAA23391; Tue, 31 Dec 1996 02:27:42 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dufault@localhost) by hda.hda.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id FAA19315; Tue, 31 Dec 1996 05:23:48 -0500 From: Peter Dufault Message-Id: <199612311023.FAA19315@hda.hda.com> Subject: Re: Iomega SCSI Zip Drive In-Reply-To: <199612310942.KAA23729@uriah.heep.sax.de> from J Wunsch at "Dec 31, 96 10:42:02 am" To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 05:23:47 -0500 (EST) Cc: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org, jonny@mailhost.coppe.ufrj.br, core@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL25 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I'll Cc freebsd-core on this, since i won't decide this myself. > Background for `core': my suggested patch would move the Iomega Zip > drives to the `od' driver since this one is better targeted towards > removable media devices. If it addresses issues for any removable disk for which "od" makes no sense it shouldn't move into od. Or do you suggest moving all removable disks (based on their inquiry) into od, which though it sounds funny makes more sense than a case-by-case decision. Peter -- Peter Dufault (dufault@hda.com) Realtime Machine Control and Simulation HD Associates, Inc. Voice: 508 433 6936