From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 19 11:10:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26E91065677 for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:10:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from mout5.freenet.de (mout5.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513B28FC12 for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:10:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from [195.4.92.16] (helo=6.mx.freenet.de) by mout5.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #19) id 1KKAKa-0007DE-0N; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 13:10:28 +0200 Received: from ma0be.m.pppool.de ([89.49.160.190]:50106 helo=peedub.jennejohn.org) by 6.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #12) id 1KKAKZ-00039I-Mr; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 13:10:27 +0200 Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 13:10:27 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn To: t_ziel Message-ID: <20080719131027.04eec331@peedub.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <48814c3c2d093@wp.pl> References: <48814c3c2d093@wp.pl> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Naming convention unification for roguelike (games) ports and new make target X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:10:29 -0000 On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 04:06:52 +0200 t_ziel wrote: > Please change text "rogue-like" to "roguelike" in all roguelike games, > so after searching (in description on freshports.org, not in port name!) > with string "roguelike", _all_ roguelike games are displayed. Maybe this > can be applied to other ports with "-" in name. > Unneccessary repository churn and not likely to happen. > Also perhaps introducing target "make installnoask" is good to avoid > many compilation questions. Instead of answering lots of questions (make > install in kde/gnome folder for example) it's easy to type something > like make install-no-ask and go for coffe (no compilation questions). > There are already mechanisms available in the ports infrastructure to do this. This might work: export BATCH=1 make install --- Gary Jennejohn