From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 30 16:52:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A29E37B401 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 16:52:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de (meitner.wh.Uni-Dortmund.DE [129.217.129.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69BC443F75 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 16:52:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (pc2-105.intern.meitner [10.3.12.105]) by meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C0B167788 for ; Thu, 1 May 2003 01:47:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kiste.my.domain (kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.12.6p2/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h3UNqU4X043899 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 1 May 2003 01:52:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net) From: Michael Nottebrock To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 01:52:29 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <200304281054.48976.ryba@kompakt.pl> <3EB05582.297F50AE@lbl.gov> <20030430231522.GO11702@surreal.seattlefenix.net> In-Reply-To: <20030430231522.GO11702@surreal.seattlefenix.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200305010152.30062.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: Re: SWAP size X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 23:52:34 -0000 On Thursday 01 May 2003 01:15, Benjamin Krueger wrote: > In what instance can you expect to have server processes that are ok to > page to disk? Almost every machine has some mostly dormant server processes which can be paged out (for example sshd's on web-servers). Sticking so much memory into a machine that nothing at all will be paged out although there are lots of processes which are idle for long amounts of time is really a waste of money. Paging is a good thing. :) -- Regards, Michael Nottebrock