From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Jul 17 2:55:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from london.physics.purdue.edu (london.physics.purdue.edu [128.210.67.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEAFF37B403; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 02:55:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@physics.purdue.edu) Received: from bohr.physics.purdue.edu (bohr.physics.purdue.edu [128.210.67.12]) by london.physics.purdue.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA13847; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 04:55:35 -0500 (EST) Received: by bohr.physics.purdue.edu (Postfix, from userid 12409) id 6334A5BB5; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 04:55:37 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 04:55:37 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: Neil Blakey-Milner , Jun Kuriyama , ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PORTREVISION bumps on dependency changes (Was: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/freetype2 Makefile) Message-ID: <20010717045537.Z97456@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> Reply-To: Will Andrews Mail-Followup-To: Maxim Sobolev , Neil Blakey-Milner , Jun Kuriyama , ports@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200107121008.f6CA8iN37556@freefall.freebsd.org> <7mg0c05n3h.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> <3B52CDFB.C125416@FreeBSD.org> <7mae253xxw.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> <20010716134702.C10331@mithrandr.moria.org> <3B52E709.6514DEC1@FreeBSD.org> <20010716151237.A22423@mithrandr.moria.org> <3B52EF44.FA989ED0@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i In-Reply-To: <3B52EF44.FA989ED0@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG on Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 04:42:36PM +0300 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 04:42:36PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev (sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG) wrote: > The FreeBSD package contains exact version of all packages it depends upon > (@pkgdep), isn't it? So, if one of those packages (library) has been upgraded > then the new package linked against this new library will contain correct > information about which versions of package with library it requires and if > upgrade is performed properly this should prevent from using packages linked > with oldest library with newest one and vice versa. I do not see what > PORTREVISION bump would add into this. How about "I am a package that has been linked with that newer version of the other package with the library bump etc" instead of "I am possibly a copy of the package with the same version number that has been linked with that newer version ..." ? -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message