From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Aug 10 07:00:16 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E1437B401
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 10 Aug 2003 07:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frost.ath.cx (BSN-95-242-77.dsl.siol.net [193.95.242.77])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ADCC43FA3
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 10 Aug 2003 07:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bfg@noviforum.si)
Received: from MORDOR (mordor.lucky.si [192.168.200.250])
	by frost.ath.cx (ESMTP) with SMTP id 6B0E3F
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 10 Aug 2003 16:00:12 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <001701c35f47$b9379450$fac8a8c0@MORDOR>
From: "Branko F. Gracnar" <bfg@noviforum.si>
To: <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030809153034.49407A-100000@fledge.watson.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 16:00:14 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Subject: Re: 5.1-R acl problem (again)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 14:00:16 -0000

Thanks for quick and very informative answer.

You're right about getfacl -d (i used linux + acl patch before, where =
default acls are displayed without any arguments and i didn't read =
getfacl man page).

Thanks alot again.


But there is one thing, i don't understand.

if i issue the following command:

setfacl -dm u::rwx,g::rx,o::---,u:branko:rwx,m::rwx  directory

and then create file under that directory, why getfacl reports:

#file:a/c
#owner:0
#group:0
user::rw-
user:branko:rwx         # effective: r--
group::r-x              # effective: r--
mask::r--
other::r--

why is mask just 'r' ?!

Brane