From owner-freebsd-security  Thu Aug 28 09:42:26 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA08597
          for security-outgoing; Thu, 28 Aug 1997 09:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from super-g.inch.com (super-g.com [207.240.140.161])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA08592
          for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 28 Aug 1997 09:42:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (spork@localhost)
	by super-g.inch.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA23954;
	Thu, 28 Aug 1997 12:44:48 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 12:44:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: spork <spork@super-g.com>
X-Sender: spork@super-g.inch.com
To: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
cc: Omar Thameen <omar@clifford.inch.com>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-97:04.procfs
In-Reply-To: <199708281535.LAA06331@homeport.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970828124429.23943A-100000@super-g.inch.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

He did, check out his message... ;)

Charles

On Thu, 28 Aug 1997, Adam Shostack wrote:

> If you search the bugtraq archives, you can find exploit code.  Why
> not grab some and test for yourself if your systems are vulnerable?
> 
> Adam
> 
> 
> Omar Thameen wrote:
> | What's the official word on whether 2.1.7 is vulnerable?  I know below
> | says that 2.1.* is, but the previous discussion indicated that it was
> | not.  I personally haven't gotten the exploit to work, but I may be doing
> | something wrong.
> | 
> | Omar
> 
> 
> -- 
> "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
> 					               -Hume
> 
>