Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:07:40 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Mark Murray <markm@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What to do about tgammal? Message-ID: <20211214200740.GB49922@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <813F29E3-8478-4282-9518-5943DE7B5492@FreeBSD.org> References: <20211204185352.GA20452@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <E5711C71-1095-4B6B-A33A-4CDFF123AB62@FreeBSD.org> <20211213022223.GA41440@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <813F29E3-8478-4282-9518-5943DE7B5492@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 06:26:13PM +0000, Mark Murray wrote: > > This is now visible for review at > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33444 <https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33444>; > Thanks! I looks okay to me (but, of course, I wrote the patch ;-) BTW, I'll probably take a shot at ld128 tgammal(x) this weekend as I still have my account on your aarch64 system for testing. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20211214200740.GB49922>