From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 17:45:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A3C106566C for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:45:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coco@executive-computing.de) Received: from mail.moehre.org (mail.moehre.org [195.96.35.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61FE8FC0A for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:45:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.moehre.org (unknown [195.96.35.7]) by mail.moehre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88818B143B; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:45:44 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.964 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.964 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, AWL=0.036, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mail.moehre.org ([195.96.35.7]) by mail.moehre.org (mail.moehre.org [195.96.35.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h8SFmMq5Q-AA; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:45:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from s560x.c0c0.intra (p54B09CAF.dip.t-dialin.net [84.176.156.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: coco@executive-computing.de) by mail.moehre.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22FE98B1420; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:45:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:45:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Marco Steinbach X-X-Sender: coco@s560x.c0c0.intra To: Jakub Lach In-Reply-To: <1346329887307-5739274.post@n5.nabble.com> Message-ID: References: <1346329887307-5739274.post@n5.nabble.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS journal error on 10.0-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:45:53 -0000 On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, Jakub Lach wrote: > If I were you, I would try regular fsck, as here > (9-STABLE) using journal has left me with fs > inconsistencies. Could you elaborate on the inconsistencies you encountered ? MfG CoCo