Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:57:15 -0800
From:      Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To:        "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD-amd64@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Problems with AMD64 and 8 GB RAM?
Message-ID:  <20050330225715.GA4816@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20050330224445.GW84137@wantadilla.lemis.com>
References:  <20050330222439.GU84137@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20050330223546.GA4705@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050330224445.GW84137@wantadilla.lemis.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 08:14:45AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 14:35:46 -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 07:54:39AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> >> None of these problems occur when I use 4 GB memory.  About the only
> >> strangeness, which seems to come from the BIOS, is that it recognizes
> >> only 3.5 GB.  If I put all DIMMS in, it recognizes the full 8 GB
> >> memory.
> >>
> >> I realize that this isn't enough to diagnose the problem.  The reason
> >> for this message now is to ask:
> >>
> >> 3.  Where should I look next?
> >
> > Have you run sysutils/memtest86 with the 8 GB?
> 
> Heh.  Difficult when the system doesn't run.

That's what happens when 1 of 8 (1 of 4?) DIMM is bad :-)

> > I had 4 bad out of 12 tested where the DIMMs were Crucial PC2700 2GB
> > Reg. ECC DIMMs.
> 
> OK, this makes sense.  It might also explain why the 4 GB
> configuration only recognizes 3.5 GB.

Search amd64 mailing list.  The missing memory is reserved for
something which escapes me at the moment.  Similar to the 
infamous ISA memory hole.

-- 
Steve



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050330225715.GA4816>