From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 03:44:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 296021E8; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 03:44:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dougbarton.us (dougbarton.us [IPv6:2607:f2f8:ab14::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 120A187C; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 03:44:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bcn-dbarton.lan (unknown [67.159.169.102]) by dougbarton.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 99F9D22B0D; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 03:44:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dougbarton.us; s=dkim; t=1420775058; bh=By+3RbEfwkyufwp0Kv3OATYdzLhve3H/FrzD6qvN3j8=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject; b=jGfiY995ACp+0Kzc4j2M1OI70FGebDZUibpug+7q4kjWUmVnkPqOJA9e+ZaUR5JPP Z9yAeW9TwQuXNrXiVom8I2tqVHybzBjRdlCojmOygVdsLUy5Lcm0NtNaHlqzEq7Q/G 6Qocffk15J8HM6DK6aN07w7iA1Whq4SnRj7i289o= Message-ID: <54AF4E89.20308@dougbarton.us> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 19:44:09 -0800 From: Doug Barton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mat@freebsd.org Subject: BIND REPLACE_BASE option OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 03:44:26 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Mat, Can you please explain why this option was removed? It's been in the ports for over 13 years, and lots of users utilized it. I realize that BIND is no longer in the base in 10.x, but that would be a reason to make the option conditional, to continue to support the substantial user base that is still on 8.x and 9.x. Please cc me on your reply, as I am not subscribed to the list. Thanks, Doug -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUr06JAAoJEFzGhvEaGryE4gAH/3QHW3HDmvgq6sM1yI/c00O/ mMayUGB34TtneYYh1lIZJD7AeNa/rMm3QiFEa7GwgMTrks1DDNZ/JFFKz1/VLnGY ZvJSNd0F0Hn4zWVoovG+9Vhp9UA15dK2aGjdTdY6rUkXAu+xko8aL7XELOUFHZPa N4qL2aWbpk2xzYl7lOidfgcazGz/tGU1u33suBpXJqO+v1K8Bl1IvbdXZ65rve1J +7K7craZBsKJn7KVkhMG1Zzj7rdLIY/Bd5fA3v/Qqmk+AXLVxwFUNX5hRjH50aRj 9bpw3nqdDCt8JoA/o7j2YlB4BFJjxTo7lon5bqB5ppum3yCmdx5M5npR7UNFcQg= =FeSn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----