Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 11:14:14 +0000 From: James Raftery <james@kerna.ie> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: jails update Message-ID: <20030306111414.GB95910@bender.kerna.ie> In-Reply-To: <20030306140038.M43664@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <m3znoa8543.fsf@teg.local> <20030305135652.GA83413@ei.bzerk.org> <m3u1ehuc9w.fsf@teg.local> <020c01c2e340$ee8f5c60$19fd2fd8@westbend.net> <m31y1l1xcz.fsf@teg.local> <20030306140038.M43664@woozle.rinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 02:02:37PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > We avoid this (and the whole need to update multiple jails) by > installing to dedicated partition and the do multiple read-only null > mounts, so each jail has perfectly equal read-only /usr (with symlinks > outside to /home, /local, etc) The rather blunt warning in the BUGS sections of the mount_null man page[0] had put me off using it. How stable is nullfs these days? [0] ``... NOT YET FULLY SUPPORTED (READ: IT DOESN'T WORK) ...'' -- James Raftery. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030306111414.GB95910>