From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Sep 26 5:19:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moon.harmonic.co.il (moon.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E42C37B42C for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 05:19:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by moon.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA26738; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 14:18:25 +0200 To: Krzysztof Parzyszek Subject: Re: Load averages Message-ID: <969970705.39d094111339d@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 14:18:25 +0200 (IST) From: Roman Shterenzon Cc: Doug Barton , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20000925183854.A10200@buchanan-181-249.stures.iastate> <20000925203603.A10466@buchanan-181-249.stures.iastate> In-Reply-To: <20000925203603.A10466@buchanan-181-249.stures.iastate> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.2 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Quoting Krzysztof Parzyszek : > On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:52:07PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > > > > Yup. There are some issues with load average in -current right now > > related to the SMPng code that produce the same symptoms, which is why > I > > mentioned it. So now the question is, what do tools like top, ps, > systat, > > etc. say? > > top actually said a lot... It turned out that iplog was consuming 98% > of processor's time. Another question is: why? Anyway, I killed it and > restarted it again and it runs fine now. > I don't know why I didn't see it before... > If it happends again you can bug the MAINTAINER... It's probably a bug in the iplog rather than in FreeBSD. --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message