From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 5 07:35:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E72E16A41F for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 07:35:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wilfre@tcom.ru) Received: from tcom.ru (ns.ahtuba.com [213.59.125.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF4343D4C for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 07:35:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wilfre@tcom.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tcom.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1796E7E3ECE for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 10:35:30 +0300 (MSK) Received: from tcom.ru ([213.59.125.30]) by localhost (ahtuba.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79097-10 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 10:35:28 +0300 (MSK) Received: from [172.16.2.134] (unknown [172.16.2.134]) by tcom.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450937E3C3B for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 10:35:28 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <4393EDBF.5010609@tcom.ru> Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 10:35:27 +0300 From: "Andrey V. Semyonov" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050429 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ahtuba.com Subject: RE: Adding /usr/local/etc/rc.d to the base rcorder X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 07:35:36 -0000 I apologise for wrong PR-group that a PR was sended to, but it seems to be very strange that no attantion was made to it at all. And, I continue to suppose that the PR's way to `rcorder` scripts via localpkg is more simple (and works fine as I tested) that offered by Doug Barton. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=85206