From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Fri Jul 31 08:52:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7459AE08E for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:52:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jenkins-admin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from jenkins-9.freebsd.org (jenkins-9.freebsd.org [8.8.178.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD46CD8D; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:52:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jenkins-admin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from jenkins-9.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jenkins-9.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2154F6D5; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:52:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:52:31 +0000 (GMT) From: jenkins-admin@FreeBSD.org To: jmg@FreeBSD.org, jenkins-admin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <1756839484.55.1438332752105.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-9.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <152456498.51.1438323719300.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-9.freebsd.org> References: <152456498.51.1438323719300.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-9.freebsd.org> Subject: FreeBSD_HEAD_arm64 - Build #739 - Fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Jenkins-Job: FreeBSD_HEAD_arm64 X-Jenkins-Result: SUCCESS Precedence: bulk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:52:31 -0000 FreeBSD_HEAD_arm64 - Build #739 - Fixed: Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_arm64/739/ Full change log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_arm64/739/changes Full build log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_arm64/739/console Change summaries: 286110 by jmg: temporarily fix build.. This isn't the final fix, and testing is still on going, but it has passed world for mips and powerpc... I know this has an extra semicolon, but this is the patch that is tested... Looks like better fix is to use _Static_assert...