From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 30 05:51:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A072B37B401; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 05:51:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3183543F75; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 05:51:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from gamplex.bde.org (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3p2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA31521; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:51:11 +1000 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:51:09 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org To: Luigi Rizzo In-Reply-To: <20030730004236.A84059@xorpc.icir.org> Message-ID: <20030730224917.F2810@gamplex.bde.org> References: <200307292157.h6TLv1VE066076@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030730073231.GB37041@sunbay.com> <20030730004236.A84059@xorpc.icir.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: Ruslan Ermilov cc: Bruce Evans cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 locore.s X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 12:51:25 -0000 On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:32:31AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:57:01PM -0700, Bruce Evans wrote: > > > bde 2003/07/29 14:57:01 PDT > > > ... > > > Log: > > > Restored clearing of the bss, except for putting it in a correct place > > > with up to date comments. This fixes booting kernels with boot2 > > > (except for loss of the features provided by loader) and is suitable > > > for MFC. Contrary to the old comments, most loaders don't clear the bss. > > > biosboot lost clearing of the bss in a code crunch in 1997, and boot2 > > > never did it. > > > > > To make it crystal clear, it does mean that we can (once again) boot > > kernels without loader(8) on i386, correct? > > interesting to hear, how comes picobsd images (which do not use the loader) > have always worked apparently without problems even after warm reboots ? Maybe picobsd images have never been compiled by gcc-3.3. There was only a small problem until recently. Bruce