From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 18 23:08:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77FC716A40F for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 23:08:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D9213C4B2 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 23:08:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from hymn01.u.washington.edu (hymn01.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.55]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.06) with ESMTP id l6IN8KNv003427 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:08:21 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn01.u.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l6IN8Kdr006128; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:08:20 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.55.52.3] by hymn01.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:08:20 PDT Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:08:20 -0700 (PDT) From: youshi10@u.washington.edu To: Ivan Voras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-PMX-Version: 5.3.2.304607, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.7.18.154033 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='NO_REAL_NAME 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposal for alleviating disk read / write time X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 23:08:26 -0000 On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Ivan Voras wrote: > Garrett Cooper wrote: > >> Clarifications and comments are more than welcome. I really >> appreciate it. > > Hmm, your requirements look more and more like a... database? :) > > [whistling away...] I know. The only catch is that the last time I brought up databases it turned into a big discussion, where I got the following (paraphrased) opinions: 1. MySQL rules -- BDB sucks! 2. It'll be a cold day in %$#@ before SQL is included in the base system -- even SQL-Lite. 3. BDB isn't non-atomic and not stable. Unless something more constructive is going to be discussed, I'm not going to pursue that semi-bikeshed topic again. -Garrett