From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 24 19:23:04 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA16254 for current-outgoing; Mon, 24 Feb 1997 19:23:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA16246 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 1997 19:23:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id TAA04688; Mon, 24 Feb 1997 19:22:42 -0800 (PST) To: Nate Williams cc: Jimbo Bahooli , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: anoncvs server In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 24 Feb 1997 19:36:27 MST." <199702250236.TAA19435@rocky.mt.sri.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 1997 19:22:42 -0800 Message-ID: <4685.856840962@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I *certainly* don't speak for core, but anoncvs is a *huge* > networking/CPU load, much more than CVSup and the CPU load is *much* > higher than SUP (though the network load can be better than SUP). Well, I have a server I can run it on (and it's not on any of our machines :-) so it's more a matter of waiting for CVS to DTRT. It's a service I'd like to offer *just* as an alternate for those who are already used to or prefer it for some reason. And yes, John Polstra also needs to document shared CVS repository usage with CVSup a little better. :-) Jordan