From owner-freebsd-current Tue Feb 16 22:22:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6CFC10F1B for ; Tue, 16 Feb 1999 22:22:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA24576; Tue, 16 Feb 1999 22:15:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpdi24573; Wed Feb 17 06:15:13 1999 Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 22:15:08 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Luoqi Chen Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, doconnor@gsoft.com.au Subject: Re: VM patch.. SMP and SO5.0 In-Reply-To: <199902170416.XAA25400@lor.watermarkgroup.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG who's looked at this. It looks to me that this is serious stuff.... spliting the pmap out of the vmspace structure is a big change. caertainly a logical move but requires checking.. I guess it should be refered to the VM cabal. I presume that this is to be done in conjunction with the linuxthreads (and native threads) code already committed... What exactly is the reason for separating them? julian On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Luoqi Chen wrote: > You may try my patch at http://www.freebsd.org/~luoqi, which would allow > linux threads to run on SMP. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message