From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Sep 11 20:03:10 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id UAA17670 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 11 Sep 1995 20:03:10 -0700 Received: from wsantee.oz.net (root@wsantee.oz.net [204.118.240.207]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA17661 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 1995 20:03:06 -0700 Received: (from wsantee@localhost) by wsantee.oz.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id UAA06846 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Sep 1995 20:03:01 -0700 From: Wes Santee Message-Id: <199509120303.UAA06846@wsantee.oz.net> Subject: jpeg-5b port broken in -stable? To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1995 20:03:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME7a] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 928 Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Has somebody installed the jpeg-5b port /usr/ports/graphics/jpeg recently? If the PLIST package file is any indication, several files aren't being installed. A quick peek at work/jpeg-5b/Makefile shows us that the JPEG libraries aren't installed by default so only the jpeg executable files are actually installed by the port. Further, there is no option in either Makefile to build a shared library so anything looking for libjpeg.so.5.3 is SOL. Is this the expected behavior or is the port broken? Is there another port that provides libjpeg.so? Netscape is complaining and I don't know if its complaint is valid or not. Cheers, -- ( -Wes Santee | You're never dead 'til you're ) ( wsantee@wsantee.oz.net | out of quarters. --InSoc ) ( http://www.oz.net/~wsantee \------------------------------ ) ( O S / 2 W A R P Finger for PGP info F r e e B S D )