From owner-freebsd-multimedia Tue Jun 10 05:37:10 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA01765 for multimedia-outgoing; Tue, 10 Jun 1997 05:37:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wrasse.csv.warwick.ac.uk (wrasse.csv.warwick.ac.uk [137.205.148.203]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA01755 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 1997 05:36:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Mr M P Searle Message-Id: <2477.199706101231@wrasse.csv.warwick.ac.uk> Received: by wrasse.csv.warwick.ac.uk id NAA02477; Tue, 10 Jun 1997 13:31:19 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: matrox millenium / XFree86 3.3 xbench results 8) In-Reply-To: <199706100422.VAA08195@rah.star-gate.com> from Amancio Hasty at "Jun 9, 97 09:22:53 pm" To: hasty@rah.star-gate.com (Amancio Hasty) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 13:31:13 +0100 (BST) Cc: multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > {hasty} awk -f scripts/xstones.awk < results/matrox.run > TOTAL 1947365 lineStones > TOTAL 964984 fillStones > TOTAL 452761 blitStones > TOTAL 61404537 arcStones > TOTAL 3285909 textStones > TOTAL 993398 complexStones > TOTAL 1139709 xStones > ^^^^^^^ > I am in love ! > > resolution 1280x1024 color depth: 8 > > Not too long ago X servers based on et4000 used to clock in around 10 to > 15k xstones. In such a short time to get this kind of performance > is almost a miracle . > But why run it in 8bpp? (Have you got any figures for 16 or 24bpp?) BTW, I'm fairly sure this is more than Xi claim for the Millenium, the fastest card under AccelX. IIRC AccelX/Millenium does 1.0-1.1 MxStones. They also have no numbers for higher bpps... Thanks, Michael.