From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 19:05:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4221BA4A; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:05:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (hades.sorbs.net [67.231.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB9AD48; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:05:33 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NC00092QD7NOD00@hades.sorbs.net>; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:09:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-id: <541889F4.7080503@sorbs.net> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:05:24 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Thomas Zander Subject: Re: Heads up audio/video/graphics/multimedia/net/streaming port maintainers - ACTION REQUIRED References: In-reply-to: Cc: ports@freebsd.org, multimedia@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:05:34 -0000 Thomas Zander wrote: > I have prepared a drop-in replacement for the ffmpeg port which uses > the recent 2.4 release. You can download it from: > http://people.freebsd.org/~riggs/ffmpeg-2.4.tar.xz > > Please check whether the ports maintained by you build and link with > this version and prepare a suitable fix if necessary. > Any reason why you can't create an 'ffmpeg24' port so it can go live then people can create a a port option to turn on using the later version - then when the ports are all updated you can just 'switch it to the default'... that seems to be the way the ports tree has been handled over the last year. -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/