From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 20 15:00:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8721065670 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:00:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F2A8FC14 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:00:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8KF0J7P056679 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:00:19 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o8KF0JaO056658; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:00:19 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:00:19 GMT Message-Id: <201009201500.o8KF0JaO056658@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org From: Dmitry Kubov Cc: Subject: Re: i386/135447: [i386] [request] Intel Core i7 and Nehalem-EP new features not supported X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dmitry Kubov List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:00:20 -0000 The following reply was made to PR i386/135447; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dmitry Kubov To: Andriy Gapon Cc: jh@freebsd.org, brucec@freebsd.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i386/135447: [i386] [request] Intel Core i7 and Nehalem-EP new features not supported Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 18:41:08 +0400 > on 20/09/2010 17:06 Dmitry Kubov said the following: >> Maybe I need some kind of powerd running? No any info about TurboBoost tune on >> FreeBSD. > So you do have the levels reported in cx_supported? > This is not what you attached to the PR. And this is not what I tried to debug. > I am not sure what changed in your environment, but you should have said that you > have the those levels reported and not wasted my time on this. > > Please ask the above on questions@. Change is 7.2 upgraded to 8.1