Date: Sun, 17 Dec 1995 20:17:13 +0200 From: Heikki Suonsivu <hsu@clinet.fi> To: Mark Hittinger <bugs@freebsd.netcom.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD-current-stable ??? (fwd) Message-ID: <199512171817.UAA16727@plentium.clinet.fi> In-Reply-To: Mark Hittinger's message of 17 Dec 1995 18:57:59 %2B0200
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Perhaps we need a 2.1-stable, 2.2-performance, and a 2.3-boom :-) 2.3-boom
could be the new wild west :-) I know there is a disk space issue.
The problem is that people are committing broken code into source tree
without testing it. There should never be need for more than two threads,
one which is being stabilized and one development. Both of them should be
workable when checked out. As CVS makes doing separate testing trees easy,
there should be no reason for untested code ever be committed?
--
Heikki Suonsivu, T{ysikuu 10 C 83/02210 Espoo/FINLAND,
hsu@clinet.fi work +358-0-4375209 fax -4555276 home -8031121
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199512171817.UAA16727>