Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 11:31:08 -0800 From: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> To: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Amazon AMIs Message-ID: <8a139c9c-b98b-4a54-1d7c-0ea1e3dc7a72@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <f002c020-1e63-c12f-456e-e20f8546a701@FreeBSD.org> References: <f002c020-1e63-c12f-456e-e20f8546a701@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/20/19 3:00 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Question: Why is m4.large the recommended instance type? Surely we'd be > better served and present users with a better experience by recommending an m5 > instance as one of the more modern and higher performance types? Last time I looked at this, we weren't handling hotplug/hotunplug of "NVMe" disks properly on the m5/c5/etc. instances. I opted to recommend the instance which completely works rather than the one with slightly better performance... -- Colin Percival Security Officer Emeritus, FreeBSD | The power to serve Founder, Tarsnap | www.tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8a139c9c-b98b-4a54-1d7c-0ea1e3dc7a72>