Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:53:01 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 63836 for review Message-ID: <417FFC9D.1080500@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <200410271747.i9RHlpjg005855@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200410271747.i9RHlpjg005855@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin wrote: > on needresched? If so, it goes into sched_userret(). >+- Need lots of thought on realtime and idle time priorities and handling >+ tsleep() priority "boosts" for such processes. Might need to make >+ the priority boost be something passsed to sched_sleep() rather than >+ a sched_prio() call. > I'd like to see the boost kept separate and added during the calcualtions that way various algorythms could be used on the boost.. for example I'd like to see the boost exponentially reduced each clocktick encounterred in userspace or maybe the boost could include a suggested lifetime.. e.g. "boost by 10% for 20mSec"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?417FFC9D.1080500>