From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 08:51:51 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430D616A4BF for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 08:51:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DBFD43FE0 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 08:51:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA02935; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 09:51:38 -0600 (MDT) X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook renders your system susceptible to Internet worms. Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20030905094945.02cbe8b0@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 09:51:32 -0600 To: Rahul Siddharthan From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <20030905033417.GA1374@online.fr> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030904205452.03b38c40@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030904135920.03aab5e0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030904205124.038334c0@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org cc: Mark Murray Subject: Re: Ugly Huge BSD Monster X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 15:51:51 -0000 At 09:34 PM 9/4/2003, Rahul Siddharthan wrote: >Brett Glass wrote: >> If you view GPLed code, and then write something similar, you are >> open to claims that your work is derivative of the GPLed code and >> therefore must likewise be GPLed. > >You are open to the same sort of claims if you view closed-source code >(under, say, an NDA, or in a book where the authors have not >relinquished copyright for the code). Yes, you are. >However, with the GPL, the FSF or whoever owns the copyrights will be >satisfied if you remove the offending code fragments: Not true. If the GPL is enforceable (which I believe it's not, but I do not have the money for a test case), they've gotcha. Remember, the GPL says that it's permanent and irrevocable. --Brett Glass